7.4 Point-to-Point Correspondence Non-Example #1
If you said “cat” as the result of hearing someone say “feline,” there would be NO point-to-point correspondence between the stimulus and the response. “Feline” has five sounds or components while “cat” only has three.
Point-to-Point Correspondence
A relationship between a discriminative stimulus and the response it controls with the following features:
The discriminative stimulus must have two or more components
The response must have two or more components
The first part of the stimulus must control the first part of the response, the second part of the stimulus must control the second part of the response, etc.
Formal or dynamic characteristics of the stimulus
Formal or dynamic characteristics of the response
This section is for the civil and public discussion of the content of this page. We reserve the right to moderate and remove comments that are irrelevant, disrespectful, hateful, harassing, threatening, or spamlike. If you are experiencing a technical issue, please contact us for assistance.