Reviews
See what our customers say about us and our products!
Add a review
You must be logged in to post a review
Log In
5 star | 65% | |
4 star | 27% | |
3 star | 6% | |
2 star | 1% | |
1 star | 1% |
1-5 of 14 reviews
See what our customers say about us and our products!
5 star | 65% | |
4 star | 27% | |
3 star | 6% | |
2 star | 1% | |
1 star | 1% |
Sought out a VB-MAPP CEU offering to learn more about the assessment, but this taught me next to nothing. I don’t recommend, waste of time and money.
My short argument would be that this very paper, demonstrating MY INABILITY to learn these topics, through MY already established Derived Operant Class Mastery of derived relational frames, is only more evidence that RFT is such a profound over-complication and explanatory fiction of stimulus equivalence that we shouldn’t be teaching it. Zero out of Ten, do not recommend.
This is one of the most excessive uses of the over-complication of a behavior analytic subject. Why can’t we all just get on board with stimulus equivalence and call it a day?
Completely ambiguous and outdated