Balancing the Right to Habilitation with the Right to Personal Liberties

Diane Bannerman, Jan Sheldon, James Sherman, & Alan Harchik

$9.99

BCBA CEUs: 1 Total CEU | 1 Ethics CEU

Read the following article and pass a 7-question quiz on it:

Bannerman, D. J., Sheldon, J. B., Sherman, J. A., & Harchik, A. E. (1990). Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: The rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 79-89.

Purchase to earn 9 Star Points
Save for Later SKU: bannerman1990 Categories: , Tags: , , , ,
Brand: CEUniverse

Description

To earn credit, you will be required to read the article and pass a 7-question quiz about it. You can retake the quiz as many times as needed, but you will not receive exactly the same questions each time.

Abstract

In the pursuit of efficient habilitation, many service providers exercise a great deal of control over the lives of clients with developmental disabilities. For example, service providers often choose the client’s habilitative goals, determine the daily schedule, and regulate access to preferred activities. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of allowing clients to exercise personal liberties, such as the right to choose and refuse daily activities. On one hand, poor choices on the part of the client could hinder habilitation. On the other hand, moral and legal issues arise when the client’s right to choice is abridged. Recommendations are offered to protect both the right to habilitation and the freedom to choose.

View Full Article

Reviews

There are no reviews yet

Leave a Comment

Q & A

Ask a question
There are no questions yet

You may also like…

Safe and secure online payment

Visa
MasterCard
PayPal logo
Apple Pay
Google Pay

help-solid Excellent customer support

Search
×
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop
      Apply Coupon